Cost Guides

How Much Does Fix and Flip Insurance Cost in Maine?

Workers on scaffolding spreading a mortar patch across a multi-toned brick elevation, new windows already set into the openings below — fix and flip insurance in Maine

No figure appears on this page. What settles a Maine renovation first is not a rate at all — it is whether the admitted market will take the building, because this state’s own insurance regulator has published a list of what it struggles to place, and a house in the middle of a flip answers to several lines of it.

A list the Bureau publishes, and the rows a half-finished house lands on

Maine’s Bureau of Insurance reports on its own market once a year, and the account is not a gloomy one. Its property and casualty availability report says property and casualty coverage is widely available in the admitted market, and calls the personal market stable and competitive.

Then it prints a list. New applicants, it says, continue to have trouble obtaining coverage for certain types of risks — among them homes with prior claims, properties that are not well maintained, homes that are vacant or unoccupied, and homes that have been uninsured for a period of time.

Read that list as a rehabber and something uncomfortable happens. A house bought because it is tired, emptied for the duration, opened up, and carried across a gap between the seller’s cover and yours is not one line on it. It is four. The condition that made the building worth buying is the condition its own insurance regulator has identified as difficult to place, and no amount of enthusiasm about the finished product changes what the file says about the building today.

That is why availability leads this page rather than policy form. The seven rows beneath it are real and every one of them moves the file. None of them matters until somebody is willing to write the risk.

The rows a Maine renovation is read down, hardest first

Maine’s top row is an availability question, and the state’s own insurance regulator is the one who raised it: the Bureau prints a list of what new applicants struggle to obtain coverage for in the admitted market, and a house in the middle of a flip answers to several lines of it at the same time. The backstop that same report names is the surplus lines market. Under those come the form most owners here buy and the two perils it leaves out, then a storm retention taken as a share of the limit and the narrow condition on the larger one, then a state that licenses nobody to run the job and legislates the written agreement instead, then one code whose enforcement switches on with the size of the town. The closing rows belong to the project rather than to Maine: how far past the finishes the work goes, the unoccupied stretch running beside a loss record, and the amount the cover is written to. Nothing in this column was counted or compared; the sequence is the whole of it.

  1. Lines on the regulator’s hard-to-place list that a rehab matches The Bureau names vacant or unoccupied, not well maintained, prior claims and uninsured gaps. A flip can hit several.
  2. A form that answers for everything it has not named The consumer guide calls the special form the most popular one and says flood and earthquake are the common exclusions.
  3. A storm retention taken as a share of the limit Some policies express the windstorm deductible against the coverage limit, so the amount you argue for does double duty.
  4. No credential behind the builder, and a statute on the contract Nobody licenses the person running the job. Above a statutory value the written agreement carries required provisions.
  5. Enforcement that switches on above a population threshold One statewide code. Larger towns must enforce it, smaller ones may, and compliance stays the building owner’s duty.
  6. How far past the finishes the work goes, and what that selects A refresh and a job that opens framing, roof deck or service runs are not written on the same contract.
  7. Standing empty, claimed on before, uninsured for a stretch Three conditions on the Bureau’s own list are ones a renovation either creates for itself or arrives already carrying.
  8. Rebuilding cost for the house the schedule ends on Construction cover answers to the completed value, not the closing price and not today’s half-open structure.
The regulator’s own availability list takes the top row, which is not where a renovation figure normally begins. The contract fork most cost pages open on waits until the sixth row down.

What stands behind the admitted market here, and what it is not

The same report says where those risks go. The surplus lines market, it states, has provided coverage for many of these types of exposures, and it describes that market as an important backstop providing coverage that would otherwise not be available. It is a small share of the premium written here, which is the point: it is where the unusual ends up.

Two things follow. Maine law generally permits property and casualty risks to be written there only where an admitted market does not exist for the risk, so it is a destination reached after a search rather than a shelf you pick from. And the report is blunt about what arrives: coverage there is often more expensive, does not provide the same level of consumer protections, and covers fewer perils than coverage obtained in the admitted market.

A binder from that market is not the same document as a binder from this one, and the differences sit in the exclusions rather than on the first page. Which market a quote came out of is worth asking before the work starts.

A form that starts from everything, and the two it subtracts

The Bureau’s consumer guide describes the special form — the one it calls the most popular — as insuring the property against all perils except those the policy specifically names as not covered. Perils commonly excluded, it says, are flood and earthquake.

On a finished house that is a generous place to start. On a rehab it relocates the entire argument. If the form answers for everything it has not excluded, then the exclusions and the policy conditions are the document. A roof standing open, a heating plant that is out of the building, drained lines, nobody on site: none of those is a peril. They are conditions, and conditions are where a renovation loss is won or lost.

Flood is its own purchase. The guide states that these policies do not cover flood damage, points an owner to the National Flood Insurance Program or a private insurer, and notes that a lender will usually require it where the home sits in a flood plain. Left until the property cover is already bound, that becomes a closing-calendar problem rather than an underwriting one.

Earthquake sits outside the form as well, named in the same breath, and the guide takes it no further than the exclusion.

A retention read off the limit, and the warning that has to be running

Wind is where the coast changes the arithmetic. The same guide notes that some policies carry special deductibles for perils such as windstorm, expressed as a share of the coverage limit rather than as a flat amount. On a renovation that has a second effect nobody mentions: the completed value you argued for is also the base the storm retention is measured from, so those two decisions are really one decision.

The named-hurricane deductible is separate, and it is fenced. The availability report describes the Bureau’s own rule as allowing a higher deductible for named hurricanes while limiting its application to the period during which the location is actively under a hurricane warning from the National Weather Service, with the application ending a short while after the last warning expires for that forecast area. The rule also requires that a policyholder be told at issue that a hurricane deductible applies.

Both halves matter on a hold that runs through a season. A storm that damages an open structure outside that window is not a named-hurricane loss on the declarations page, whatever the forecast called it at the time.

Nobody credentials the builder, so the statute went to the contract

The Attorney General states it without hedging: in Maine, general contractors — and trades such as roofing and framing — are not licensed or regulated. There is no board to look a name up on, no number to put on a submission, and no classification to argue about.

What the state legislates instead is the agreement. Above a statutory contract value, home construction and repair work requires a written contract carrying specific provisions: a warranty statement, a cap on the deposit as a share of the contract price, estimated start and substantial completion dates, and any change in the work or materials that changes the price stated in a written change order signed by both parties. Those statutory requirements can be waived only after the contractor has specifically informed the owner of the rights and both agree in writing.

Read as underwriting material, that contract is the credential. Start and substantial completion dates give a policy term something real to be written against. Signed change orders produce a dated record of how the scope grew, which is the hardest thing to reconstruct once a claim is open. On a Maine file the paperwork you would have kept anyway does the work a license number does elsewhere.

The trades answer to their own examiners. Electricians go to the Electricians’ Examining Board and plumbers to the Plumbers’ Examining Board, both sitting at the Office of Professional and Occupational Regulation. Heat is the one that surprises people: there is no separately named mechanical board here, and the Maine Fuel Board examines and licenses the oil, solid fuel, propane and natural gas technicians instead. A systems rehab therefore touches three credentials from three boards, and not one of them says anything about the person coordinating the job.

One code for the whole state, enforced above a population line

The Division of Building Codes and Standards sets the arrangement out in two sentences. Municipalities above a statutory population are required by statute to enforce the Maine Uniform Building and Energy Code. Municipalities below that population may choose to.

The sentence after those is the one an owner should read twice: compliance with the code is mandatory and the responsibility of the building owner, regardless of whether a building is located in a municipality that enforces it. The duty does not shrink with the size of the town. Only the inspection does.

That splits Maine projects into two quite different files. In a larger town the permit and the inspections come from the municipal code enforcement office, the queue there sets a calendar the policy term has to reach, and the sign-offs become evidence somebody else generated. In a smaller one there may be no counter at all, and the standard still applies with nothing independent on the record to show the work met it. The second case is not the faster one. It is the quieter one, and it moves the burden of proof onto whatever the project documented for itself.

Whether the plaster comes off, and what changes when it does

Six rows down, the question most cost pages open on finally arrives. Strip the kitchen, swap the fittings, sand the floors and paint, and the house never stops being a house: the shell is intact, the roof deck is untouched, the wiring and the drains are where the last owner left them. That project belongs beside the cosmetic repair endorsement and the cosmetic rehab work we place. Pull a wall, re-deck the roof, or chase circuits back to bare framing, and what stands at the address is a construction site until the last inspection clears. That one goes on builders risk, alongside the structural rehab work.

It sits this low in Maine for a reason worth naming. Everything above it decides whether the building can be placed and in which market. This one decides how the placement is rated once it exists. Both are real. They simply do not queue up in the sequence the nationwide version of this list walks through.

Two rows a flip writes for itself, and one it arrives with

Go back to the Bureau’s list and mark the lines a project controls. Vacant or unoccupied is one a flip creates by definition: nobody sleeps in the building from one closing to the other, and the stretch after the crew leaves — a finished house waiting on a buyer through a Maine winter — is exposure at full strength with none of the noise that makes an owner think about it. Uninsured for a period of time is the other, and it is almost always accidental: a lapse between the seller’s policy ending and the construction cover starting.

Prior claims is the row you arrive with. Nothing done between today and submission improves it, which is exactly why the two rows still open deserve the attention. Vacancy also drags a second placement along behind it: general liability is what answers when somebody nobody invited walks into an unlit building on a short December afternoon.

Real-World Scenario: A farmhouse outside a Penobscot County village goes under contract in the fall on a plan to be finished and listed by spring. The town runs no code enforcement office, so no permit is pulled and nobody inspects the new heating plant. The seller’s cover ends at closing and the construction policy is arranged a few weeks later, once the schedule firms up. The work runs long. By late winter the house is finished, still empty, the thermostat set low to save oil, and a supply line lets go upstairs. The claim is paid without argument. The following year, on the next house, the submission has to answer several questions at once — an unoccupied building, a gap in cover, a paid loss, and no municipal record that the work was ever inspected — and a file that was straightforward the first time is not.

The amount at the far end of the schedule, and what to send with it

There are three figures on a rehab and construction cover answers to only one of them. The closing price is history. The budget is a plan. The placement is written to what the building is worth once the last trade has gone, and on a coastal Maine file that same amount sets the windstorm retention as well — one figure doing two jobs, which is an argument for deriving it rather than rounding it.

What to send, roughly in the order it gets read: the address, and whether it sits in a flood plain; the acquisition and budget figures, with a completed value you can defend; a scope that names what is being opened rather than gesturing at renovation; the written contract with its start and substantial completion dates in it; who is holding the tools and which board licensed them; whether the town enforces the code; the schedule with the selling window inside it; and whatever the loss record already shows, stated rather than discovered.

Wanting the regulatory picture rather than the pricing one? The Maine page sets out the Bureau, the metros this brand works hardest in and the disclosure question waiting at resale, and the states this agency is licensed in are indexed from there. To have one specific building priced rather than an average, describe the job to us — and this is who reads it.

This guide covers what drives the cost of a Maine rehab. The state page covers who licenses the trades, who issues the permit and how a project there is placed: fix and flip insurance in Maine.

The bottom line

Maine’s own insurance regulator publishes the list of exposures new applicants struggle to place in the admitted market, and a house that is empty, mid-repair, claimed on before and briefly uninsured answers to several lines of it at once — so the opening question on a Maine renovation is not what the cover costs but who is willing to write it, with the surplus lines market named as the backstop. The form, the storm retention measured off the limit, an unlicensed builder under a statutory written contract and a code enforced only above a population line all arrive after that.

Frequently asked questions

Several of the risks the Bureau lists sound exactly like my project. Is that as bad as it reads?

Less bad than it sounds, and worth reading in context. The same report says property and casualty coverage is widely available in the admitted market here and calls the personal lines market stable and competitive. The list describes new applicants with particular exposures, not the state as a whole. What it does tell you is which facts about the building an underwriter will reach for first, and every one of them can be described in advance.

The report names surplus lines as the backstop. Is being placed there a failure?

No, but it is a different product and the report says so. It describes that market as an important backstop providing coverage that would otherwise not be available, while also noting the coverage is often more expensive, does not carry the same consumer protections, and answers for fewer perils than coverage bought in the admitted market. Maine law generally allows it only where no admitted market exists for the risk.

Maine law puts required provisions inside the contract. Do any of them reach an underwriter?

Two of them reach one directly. Estimated start and substantial completion dates give a policy term something real to be written against instead of an optimistic guess. Change orders in writing and signed by both parties produce a dated account of how the scope grew, which is the hardest thing to reconstruct after a loss. The Attorney General lists both among the provisions a written contract must carry above a statutory value.

We let cover lapse between closing and the start of demolition. Does anybody actually notice?

It is a named category rather than a hunch. Homes that have been uninsured for a period of time sit on the Bureau list of risks new applicants have trouble obtaining coverage for, alongside vacancy and prior claims. A gap is also harder to describe than a continuous term, because nothing documents the condition of the building through it. Carrying cover across a pause is usually cheaper than explaining the pause.

Nobody pulled a permit because the town does not require one. Where does that leave the resale?

Holding the duty anyway. The Division of Building Codes and Standards states that compliance with the state code is mandatory and the responsibility of the building owner regardless of whether a building sits in a municipality that enforces it. No inspection happened, so nothing independent records that the work met the standard, and a buyer’s lender or inspector is the next party who will ask about it.

Why does this page put availability ahead of the policy form, when most cost guides do the reverse?

Because the regulator published the reason. Its availability report names the exposures new applicants struggle to place in the admitted market, and a building that is empty, opened up and recently uninsured answers to several of them at once. Which contract the work belongs on still matters enormously, and it is the sixth row here rather than the first. The ordering is the whole argument this page makes.

About the author

Nate Jones, CPCU

Nate Jones, CPCU, is the founder of Wexford Insurance and Fix and Flip Guard Insurance, a specialty agency placing fix-and-flip real estate investment coverage in 48 states across 10+ carrier markets. A state that credentials nobody to run the job, and whose insurance regulator publishes in its own words a list of what the admitted market struggles to take, is a state where the file has to do the talking — and reading a Maine rehab for which lines of that list it lands on, and which of them the project created for itself, is where most of his hours on one go. Reach him through the Fix and Flip Guard Insurance quote form or call 888-346-2414.

Have the Maine file read before the market reads it

Send us the address and the scope of work.

Send us the scope 888-346-2414